🔗 Share this article

The Russian central bank has declared it is claiming compensation totaling $230 billion against the securities depository Euroclear. This legal step constitutes a clear warning by the Kremlin regarding plans to use immobilized Russian sovereign funds to aid Ukraine.

The Legal Claim

Based on accounts in Russian news outlets, the monetary authority initiated a claim last week for an estimated 18 trillion roubles. This figure is equivalent to the stated $230 billion claim.

European Union officials are set to determine in the coming days regarding a plan to use approximately €210 billion in frozen Russian state funds. The proposal involves granting Ukraine with a large loan to fund its defence and financial stability.

The vast majority of these assets, amounting to €185 billion, are held at the Euroclear depository in Brussels. Euroclear acts as the primary keeper for the Kremlin's frozen sovereign wealth.

Dispute on Ownership

EU officials have argued that their proposal is on solid legal ground. Their position is based on the principle that title of the state assets remains with Russia, despite being it was immobilized in European countries following the full-scale military offensive of Ukraine.

The Russian government, however, has labeled any utilization of the funds as illegal appropriation. It has warned of reciprocal actions, such as confiscating EU corporate assets within Russia.

The head of Russia's sovereign wealth fund, who has taken on a key role in diplomatic talks, stated on a social media platform that Russia "will prevail in court" and retrieve its funds. He warned that the European Union, the common currency, and Euroclear "will suffer" from the proposal.

Strategic Positioning

With statements interpreted as an effort to create division between Europe and the United States, the official characterized the assets plan as "a severe attack on property rights and the global financial system established by the United States."

The clearing house refused to provide a statement on the latest lawsuit. It has previously stated it is contending with over 100 lawsuits in Russian courts.

Legal Hurdles Ahead

While courts in European nations are unlikely to recognize judgments from Russian courts, analysts expect Moscow to pursue implementation in nations with closer relations to the Kremlin.

"The Bank of Russia could try to implement a Russian legal ruling against Euroclear in countries such as China, Hong Kong, the UAE, Kazakhstan, and other sympathetic states, provided that relevant holdings can be located," commented a legal expert from an NSP law firm.

EU Countermeasures

EU officials indicated they are developing steps to discourage other countries from aiding any Russian legal action against EU entities. Additionally, they are designing protections to shield EU countries with investments in Russia from what they call "unlawful expropriation."

How the Funding Would Work

Under the complex scheme, the EU would provide an initial €90 billion loan to Ukraine, using the cash earned from the immobilized assets at Euroclear. Importantly, Russia's ownership claim on the principal funds would stay untouched.

Kyiv would only be obligated to repay the loan in the event that Russia consented to pay compensation for the vast damage inflicted during the nearly four-year conflict.

Other Funding Ideas

Belgium, supported by Italy, Bulgaria, and Malta, has urged the EU to consider an alternative approach for funding Ukraine. This entails common EU debt issuance to secure a loan, using unallocated funds within the EU budget.

This alternative move, however, demands unanimity among all 27 EU countries. The Hungarian government, viewed as aligned with the Kremlin, has previously expressed its opposition.

Commenting on Monday, the EU foreign policy chief, Kaja Kallas, described the reparations loan as "the most credible solution" for aiding Ukraine. "This mechanism is secured against the Russian frozen assets, meaning it is not drawn from our public funds, which is equally significant," she remarked. "Furthermore, it delivers a powerful message that if you do all this damage to another country, you have to pay for the rebuilding."